The Good Behavior of Sangha?s Buddhism: Emotional Intelligence Mental Health Power (Resilience Quotient) and Stress Coping Behaviors

Authors

  • Nuttawat Tangpatomwong Independent Scholar

Keywords:

Stress Coping, Health Power (Resilience Quotient), Emotional Intelligence Mental

Abstract

The objectives of this research were as follows: 1) To study the factors of personal data of the good behavior of Sangha?s Buddhism; 2) To study the level of emotional intelligence mental, health power (resilience quotient), stress coping and the good behavior of Sangha?s Buddhism; 3) To study the relationship between of emotional intelligence mental, health power (resilience quotient), stress coping behavior 4) To study the relationship between emotional intelligence affecting health power (resilience quotient), stress coping and the good behavior of Sangha?s Buddhism, health power (resilience quotient) affecting of the good behavior of Sangha?s Buddhism and stress coping behavior affecting of the good behavior of Sangha?s Buddhism. And 5) To predict the personal data factors, from the elements of the good behavior of Sangha?s Buddhism, emotional intelligence mental, health power (resilience quotient), stress coping behavior.

????????? The research results were showed that data on personal factor characteristics of the sample (the good behavior of Sangha?s Buddhism) of 200 monks (100%) found that most of them were in Bangkok and Chiang Mai areas with the same number of 100 monks (50%) each area, and most of them were between 30-39 years of age. 79 monks (39.5%), average 10-20 ordination years, 170 monks (85%), 111 monks (55.5%) figures below bachelor's degree, and 136 singles (68.0%) there were single marital statuses. In with the level of emotional intelligence of the samples were, the behavioral level on emotional intelligence were (high) with mean (, 3.862) and standard deviation (SD, 0.525), the level of emotional intelligence in the aspect of self-awareness (high), had a mean (, 4.061) and standard deviation (SD, 0.664). (moderate), with mean (, 3.440) and standard deviation (SD, 0.402), the results showed that the behavioral level on health power (resilience quotient) in the fight over obstacles (high), was mean (,3.642) standard deviation (SD, 0.593), the level of stress coping behavior of the sample had coping behavior level (moderate), with mean (, 3.443) standard deviation (SD, 0.406), it was found that the level of problem-solving-oriented stress coping behavior (high), had a mean (, 3.736) standard deviation (SD, 0.604), the sample group (medium), with mean (, 2.957), the standard deviation (SD, 0.338), the results showed that the sample group had a mean level of the good behavior of Sangha?s Buddhism, behavior in the aspect of cooperative behavior (moderate) (, 3.470), standard deviation (SD, 0.693). And the research hypothesis were 1 research hypothesis, 1.1 research hypothesis, 1.2 research hypothesis, 1.3 research hypothesis, 1.4 and research hypothesis 1.5, the statistics used in the test, there were the Pearson's Product Moment Correlation coefficient, the hypothesis test results were accept hypothesis 1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, were accept hypothesis 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, the hypothesis 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, the hypothesis 4 and 4.3 were accepted, the hypothesis 5, 5.1 and 5.2 were statistically significant at 0.01 level. And the research hypothesis 6, the applied statistics, in the test the results of the hypothesis test were accepted hypothesis 6, in significant predictions of personal data factors (area), (age), (level of education) and (marital status) were used, in statistically at 0.01 level.

References

กรมสุขภาพจิต กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. งานประชุมวิชาการสุขภาพจิตนานาชาติ ครั้งที่ 18. กรุงเทพฯ: กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. 2562. หน้า 24.

กรมสุขภาพจิต กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. อีคิว : ความฉลาดทางอารมณ์. กรุงเทพฯ: กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. 2543. หน้า 19.

ประเวศ วะสี. การพัฒนามนุษย์แนวใหม่เพื่ออนาคตที่ยั่งยืน พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1. กรุงเทพฯ: หมอชาวบ้าน. 2545. หน้า 55-56.

พระคัมภีรญาณ อภิปุญโญ. คู่มือก่อนท่องเที่ยวเพื่อเรียนรู้และศึกษาพุทธศาสนาในอินเดีย. กรุงเทพฯ: มหาวิทยาลัยรามคำแหง. 2559. หน้า 9.

พระอาจารย์ดร.ณัฏฐวัฒน์ ตั้งปฐมวงศ์ (ญาณปฺปโภ). 2564. การเป็นสมมุติ ?สงฆ์?: สำนึกและความ รับผิดชอบ. บทความวิชาการ. (ออนไลน์). [สืบค้นเมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2564]; เข้าถึงได้จาก https://www.blockdit.com.2564.

พระอาจารย์สงบ มนสฺสนฺโต. ธรรมะเก็บตก 15-17. ราชบุรี: มูลนิธิพระสงบ มนสฺสนฺโต. 2547. หน้า 58-64.

เยาวนาฎ ผลิตนนท์เกียรติ. Resilience concept paper. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพัฒนาสุขภาพจิต. [ม.ป.ท.]; 2551. หน้า 5-6.

Cook, S.W., & Heppner, P.P. A Psychometric Study of Three Coping Measures. Educational and psychological Measurement, 1997. Vol.57, No.6. Pp. 28.

Center for Creative Leadership. (2020). How to Create a High Learning Team. [Online]. [Retrieved Oct. 20, 2021] from https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading- effectivelyarticles/how-to-create-a-high-learning-team/

Cooper, C.L., & Marshall, J. Occupational sources of Stress : A Review of the Literature Ralating to Coronary Heart Disease and Mental Health. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1976. Pp. 220

Ignatavicius, D.D & Bayne. Medical-Surgical Nursing. Philadelphai : W.B.Saunders Company. 1991. Pp. 124.

Ivshin, E. The study of the meaning of work, emotional intelligence and conflict styles in the workplace in the 21st century. Dissertation Abstracts International, 2001. 62 (02B), PP. 1127.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. The Social Psychology of Organization (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1978. Pp. 275.

Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal, and coping. New York : Springer Publishing. 1984. Pp. 124.

Lessig, L. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. HK, Hong Kong Ltd. 1999. Pp. 59.

Goleman, D. Working with Emotional Intelligent. New York : Bantam Books. 1999. Pp. 124.

Goleman, D.P. Emotional Intelligent : Why It Can Matter More Than IQ for Character, Health and Lifelong Achievement. New York : Bantam Books. 1995. Pp. 43-44.

Greenberg, J. Managing behavior in organizations (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall. 2002. Pp. 148-149.

Organ, D.W. Organizational Citizenship Behavior : The good soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA : Lexington Book. 1988. Pp. 88-89.

Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 2004. 15 (4), Pp. 336-355.

Monat, A, & Lazarus, R. Stress and Coping. New York : University Press. 1978. Pp. 122-123.

Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1995. 16, Pp. 127-142.

Keith, M. J., Thompson, S. C., Hale, J., Lowry, P. B., & Greer, C. Information disclosure on mobile devices: Re-examining privacy calculus with actual user behavior. International journal of human-computer studies, 2013. 71 (12), 1163-1173.

Salovey,P., & Mayer, J.D. Emotional intelligence imagination. Cognition and Personality, 1990. 9, Pp. 185-211

Van Dyne, L., Graham, J.W. and Dienesch, R.M. Organizational citizen ship behavior construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal. 1994. 37: Pp. 765-802.

Published

2024-12-31